The Annual General Meeting (AGM) of Seplat Energy Plc slated for Wednesday, will hold as scheduled, as the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, has adjourned the suit number FHC/ABJ/PET/8/2023 filed by some minority shareholders in Boniface Okezie V. SEPLAT Energy Plc to May 31, 2023.
The presiding judge Hon. Justice Inyang Ekwo ordered that all the respondents should be served before the matter could be taken. All parties were represented except the 10th Respondent.
The Federal High Court declined to accede to the request by Boniface Okezie and four other alleged shareholders of Seplat Energy, who filed Suit No. FHC/ABJ/PET/8/2023 seeking an ex-parte Interim Orders to restrain Seplat from holding its AGM scheduled for May 10.
The court adjourned hearing on the petitions filed by the Petitioners to May 31. The meeting would therefore hold as planned.
In a statement signed by Seplat’s Board Chairman, Basil Omiyi, the Company has refuted all allegations made in the petitions, which, given their almost identical wording to a separate petition filed at the Federal High Court in Lagos.
He described this as clearly being part of an orchestrated attempt to damage the company in response to its efforts to improve corporate governance by eliminating related party transactions and implementing other governance initiatives.
The suit before Justice Inyang Ekwo was brought by Boniface Okezie, Bon. Bright Nwabuogwu, John Isesele, Okonkwo Timothy, and Augustine Ezechukwu (Petitioners/Applicants) against Seplat Energy PLC; company CEO, Mr. Roger Brown; Board Chairman, Mr. Basil Omiyi.
The Federal High Court declined to accede to the request by Boniface Okezie and four other alleged shareholders of Seplat Energy, who filed Suit No. FHC/ABJ/PET/8/2023 seeking an ex-parte Interim Orders to restrain Seplat from holding its AGM scheduled for May 10.
The suit also included the the Independent Non-Executive Directors of the company, Dr. Charles Okeahialam, Prof. Fabian Ajogwu, Rabiu Bello, Mrs. Bashirat Odenewu, Emma Fitzgerald; Company Secretary/Legal Adviser, Mrs. Edith Onwuchekwa, and the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC).
All parties except the 1st Respondent (Seplat Energy PLC) informed the Court that they have not been served, as ordered by the Court. The 1st Respondent also informed the Court that they have filed an affidavit to show cause and a preliminary objection on jurisdiction and the fact that a similar petition is pending at the Federal High Court in Lagos.
The Court ordered that the right thing should be done and that the 10th Respondent (CAC) should be served against the next hearing date.
The attempt by the counsel to the Petitioners to get the court to halt the AGM was opposed by each of the counsel for the Respondents. After listening to Kalu Onuoha, Esq. Counsel for the Petitioners; Wole Olanipekun, SAN, Counsel for Seplat; Matthew Burka, SAN, of Counsel for Roger Brown (who held brief of Dr. Hassan Liman, SAN) of Counsel for Rabiu Bello and Emma Fitzgerald.
Others are Uzoma Azikiwe, SAN, of Counsel for Basil Omiyi; O.A. Omonuwa, SAN, of Counsel for Dr. Charles Okeahialam and Prof. Fabian Ajogwu; and Prof. Taiwo Osipitan, SAN, of Counsel for Mrs. Bashirat Odenewu and Mrs. Edith Onwuchekwa, Justice Ekwo ruled that: “Parties are hereby ordered not to tamper with the res until issues are resolved.”
